|
Topic: radiation meter November 2011
|
| Author |
Post |
|
micro_pepe
12 posts
 Popping In
|
05-12-2011 01:40
Hello,
Is it possible to feed the meter amplifier with 5V?
Thanks for everything.
|
|

Elektor Editor
602 posts
 Power User
|
05-12-2011 12:58
Sadly that's not possible. The meter amplifier was designed to operate at about 9 volts.
Jan
|
|
micro_pepe
12 posts
 Popping In
|
14-12-2011 00:27
Hi all,
Will the control pcb, is necessary to have double ground plane?
Thanks for your attention.
|
|
Moonlight
3 posts
 Popping In
|
23-12-2011 01:19
I am having problems with getting my radiation meter working. For a start the display does not look like all those I have seen in the magazine and update. It reads L 10 not Counter!(see attachment). Also cannot get any counts with the sensor in circuit. Have tried swapping sensors as well but to no avail.
|
|
EvFarm
15 posts
 Popping In
|
29-12-2011 18:50
Same here as moonlight says.
Top left is just "L 10" rather than "Counter".
Only differnce in my case is that the number in top right is continually counting up. Could this be because I haven't wrapped the whole thing in foil yet? I have black tape over the sensor (otherwise carefully fitted as describe in January issue) but does it really all need wrapping in foil too?
Oh, and both pins of my BPW had tabs so I took the K pin to be the substrate pin (the one without the gold wire internally) as pictures in photo 4 in the January issue).
I think I will download the firmware sounrce and take a look top see if that offers any enlightenment.
|
|
EvFarm
15 posts
 Popping In
|
29-12-2011 19:32
I downloaded the firmware source from the web site. Thanks.
It does indeed display a L there followed by a number it reads from eeprom or defaults to 10. This appears to be the trigger threshold described in the article.
The firmware will not compile successfully as provided.
I tried BASCOM 1.11.9.8
I also upgraded to BASCOM 2.0.7.3
Same results. It does not like the use of "Max" as a variable name.
I suppose I can just renname that.
I a tried tinfoil wrapper but got same result - it just counts upwards. So now I need to figure out why this is triggering all the time. Out with the scope next I think.
Post edited by EvFarm
on 29-12-2011 19:56 Post edited by EvFarm
on 29-12-2011 19:57 Post edited by EvFarm
on 29-12-2011 19:58
|
|
EvFarm
15 posts
 Popping In
|
29-12-2011 20:37
Hmmm....
OK, at top of R4 I have 2.3V. That looks OK.
But at output of amplifier board I have a nice 50Hz square wave.
Even if wrapped in Al foil.
Maybe my bench PSU cables and/or a ground loop? Tomorrow I shall try running from a 9V battery and will double check the foil.
|
|

thijsbeckers
1103 posts
 Power User
|
02-01-2012 14:36
Hi Guys,
I was enjoying my days off last week, so I apologize for not being able to reply earlier. But here goes...
@ Moonlight:
L10... This is correct. As EvFarm already deducted, this is the threshold level that defaults to level 10. It was thought to be more convenient than the 'Counter' text (after pics were taken&article was sent to printer). So this is what's in the display (from left to right):
1st line: Threshold level; Counted # pulses that exceeded the threshold.
2nd line: measurement time; average pulses per minute.
The sensorboard is VERY, I repeat - VERY, sensitive. So ANY light that hits the sensor will clip the output of the board and prevent the uC from counting - or it will count like crazy... So be sure to protect the sensor from any light. Best is to use can of some sort (see attached pictures). And don't forget to connect your shielding to the GND of the sensorboard!
@EvFarm
EvFarmOnly difference in my case is that the number in top right is continually counting up.
It works!!!
EvFarmCould this be because I haven't wrapped the whole thing in foil yet? I have black tape over the sensor (otherwise carefully fitted as describe in January issue) but does it really all need wrapping in foil too?
Yes and yes. Like I said, the sensorboard is VERY sensitive (and needs to be).
Unfortunately, the sensor eventually ending up in the kit was slightly different from the one I used in the prototype (different supplier, and again, pics were already taken and article just left for printing  ). You guessed it: it has tabs on both pins... But look closely, and you will find one lead with two tabs and one lead with only one tab. The one with the ONE tab is the cathode, see also the attached close up - which shows the ANODE, by the way!
Let me investigate the matter with the compilation issues. The .hex file should be ok. Fuses should be set as in the attached screen dump, see below. I will update the download with the fuse settings.
EvFarmBut at output of amplifier board I have a nice 50Hz square wave.
I got that when I didn't ground my shielding. Did you connect the foil firmly to GND of the PCB?
Let us know when it works! What radiation source are you planning to use?
  
Post edited by thijsbeckers
on 02-01-2012 14:41 Post edited by thijsbeckers
on 03-01-2012 09:23
|
|
Moonlight
3 posts
 Popping In
|
03-01-2012 12:24
Hi thijsbeckers
Hope your Xmas & New Year was great. Thanks for the follow up. I have tried to shield my BPW but not properly as described in the project notes and update as I expected over sensitivity would be the problem, not no counts at all. I'll give it a go and do it properly! I plan to use some pressure lamp mantles as a source which work well with another type of radiation detector I have.
I too was confused by the orientation of the BPW and have since sourced a replacement which has only one tab on the cathode instead of the two supplied in the kit.
I'll post an update soon on my progress.
Thanks....
|
|

thijsbeckers
1103 posts
 Power User
|
04-01-2012 14:13
Hi Moonlight,
Are you sure those mantles are radioactive? I ask, because I have some old ones that are and some new ones that aren't! I should read better, you tested them already with another radiation detector...
Ok, you should be able to detect some radiation with those mantles, but with a BPW34 you'll probably only detect beta particles. If you are in the possession of an oscilloscope, you can display the output of the sensor amplifier on it (connect to the header marked 'out' on the main PCB) and watch each radiation particle hit the silicon. Switch your scope to persistence mode and watch the peaks rising above the noise floor. This also helps with determining the correct threshold setting.
BTW, we are planning a webinar on this project somewhere in February...
|
|
EvFarm
15 posts
 Popping In
|
13-01-2012 17:51
Hi thijsbeckers
Now I have it running off a 9v battery rather than my bench PSU it seems to have settled down.
Anyone trying this please note... battery PSU is a good idea and as above, the grounded foil (or tin can) wrapper are essential.
I have to say it does not seem very sensitive. I have a small jar of thorianite next to the sensor and I have seen just a few counts. So that I get an average level of between 0.8 and 1.3
This same thorianite sample causes many clicks per second on my GM counter.
|
|
al.harding
1 post
 Popping In
|
18-01-2012 12:12
Do you think the radiation meter is capable of detecting the presence of radon gas. My home has been tested a few years ago and found to be within safe limits but it would be good to know if the concentration of radon varies significantly from room to room?
thanks Alan
|
|
JJL
3 posts
 Popping In
|
24-01-2012 14:17
Hello,
I'm trying to test the 'Improved Radiation Detector' (PCB purchased from Elektor) but I can't figure out how to make the connection to PC from the K7 Jumper.
If I look in the article at the circuit diagram (p21) pin 2 of the ATMEGA88 (RXD) is drawn connecting to the middle pin of the K7 jumper labelled TXD. If I check this on the PCB, the track from pin 2 on the chip is clearly connected to the top pin of the K7. (A simple test with a scope shows that pin3 on the chip is talking)
I'm unsure if this is a mistake in the circuit diagram, so I test all the pins, but then I'm unsure of the pin connections on the PC serial port.
I have the associated software running on a PC. I test all the pins with a scope and find that pin3 on my com port has signal when pressing either the 'level' or the 'eprom' button on the software.
However, the only way I have found to change the threshold (the Lxx on the display) is to connect pin 3 to the TXD pin which doesn't make sense. A pin-pin diagram for the program or instructions on how to connect it to the K7 terminal would be very helpful!! (no need to use the BoB FT232 board as I have a serial port already)
Thanks,
|
|
ronwer
42 posts
 Occasional Visitor
|
27-01-2012 10:39
I want to build the meter in SMD...any advice regarding the components?
What about the capacitors, are good quality ceramic C's usable for the 100nF's?
Is there an alternative for the BF245? (I only have the MMBFJ310 in stock at this time.)
|
|
Moonlight
3 posts
 Popping In
|
27-01-2012 23:18
Hi thijsbeckers
I am at wits end with this project. Have mounted the PCB in a can and connected an earth lead to the board but all I get are continuous counts. Tried various BPW34s in circuit. All behave the same way.
BTW I would attend your Web seminar but it's scheduled at 2AM Australian time. Any chance future seminars can be run earlier so us downunders get to participate.
Thanks
|
|
JJL
3 posts
 Popping In
|
30-01-2012 11:10
Have you tried setting the threshold level to different points?
The threshold works as a comparator, counting only values above the threshold value. This is helpful to get above the noise background.
You set this via the K7 jumper with the associated computer program (a manual for the computer program or a explanation of how the K7 pins connect to a serial port would be very helpful for making this connection, I'm having trouble with this point)
|
|
Jakket
6 posts
 Popping In
|
02-02-2012 19:59
Hello,
I did some testing with another Photodiode SLCD-61N1 (not PIN) from Silonex I found @ Farnell for next to nothing. It is a 5x2,5 mm. bare chip that is passivated and can be soldered, but don't try this after a heavy night in the pub  )
The thing is... it works extremely well for Alfa emitters, an Americum241 from a fire detector @ 2cm from the diode gives around 2800+ tics per minute. I did change the gate resistance to ground to 10Mohm i.o. 20.
|
|
EvFarm
15 posts
 Popping In
|
07-02-2012 14:21
> SLCD-61N1
Thanks for the tip-off Jakket. They look interesting (and very cheap, especially for the remaining stock of non-rohs parts).
I have ordered a few of those, plus some of the larger-area parts (SLCD-61n...) to experiment with.
|
|

thijsbeckers
1103 posts
 Power User
|
07-02-2012 17:03
First let me sincerely apologize for my absence in this thread. I was in the presumption I activated the e-mail monitor for this thread, but due to several spam filters on my mailbox I didn’t receive any of the mails. Since it’s rather busy in the office, I haven’t had the time to surf around in the forum.
So here goes:
@EvFarm:
Good to see it’s working. The ‘sensor’ indeed isn’t very sensitive; you need a sufficiently energetic radioactive sample for the pulses to rise above the noise level. That’s a bit of a downside of the BPW34. Perhaps other semiconductors are more sensitive? I see Jakket has some good results with an SLCD-61N1.
@al.harding:
As you can read in the Wiki-article on Radon it’s alfa decay-energy is quite high, I think it should be measurable with a 2N3055 as sensor. But please keep in mind even a couple of cm’s (or inches) of air are enough to stop alfa radiation. Also, you should completely darken your room, since any light will generate a false trigger.
As for the beta-component of the Rn-224 isotope (0.8 MeV), I don’t know if this is measurable with the BPW34-sensor; we didn’t test (we don’t have the necessary equipment for this...).
Perhaps the multiple-sensor setup on http://www.b-kainka.de/bastel131.html (a little past the first half the page) is something for you.
@JJL:
Good of you to notice. After carefully checking with the designer of the BOB we discovered an error in the schematic (not on the PCB!): in fig 1 RXD and TXD on connector K7 should be physically exchanged. So, the connections are correct, but the layout of K7 is misleading. A picture is worth a thousand words... (see attached image)
@ronwer:
No special components were used, so you’re free to substitute. Ceramics are ok for decoupling, I see no problems there. As for the FET: I’m not saying it doesn’t work with an MMBFJ310, but a BFR30, BFR31 or an MMBF4416 is the recommended SMT replacement.
@Moonlight:
What happens if you leave the sensor out? So no sensor connected at all... I’m beginning to think that perhaps you have a very good BF245 (with a high amplification factor). Have you tried raising the detection threshold level, as JJL suggested?
2AM in the morning? O dear… It’s scheduled at 4 PM here in The Netherlands. The webinar will be available afterwards on the element14 website, so you can watch it at a more convenient time. You don’t have the possibility to participate in the Q&A afterwards then, but you can send me an e-mail if you have questions after viewing the webinar.

Post edited by thijsbeckers
on 07-02-2012 17:05 Post edited by thijsbeckers
on 07-02-2012 17:07
|
|
JJL
3 posts
 Popping In
|
13-02-2012 14:43
Thanks thijsbeckers, that helps alot.
Can I ask how to connect the board to a PC without using the BoB addition.
Does the K7 jumper just connect to pins 1,2,3 of a (9pin) serial port? Something like:
pin1 - gnd?
pin2 - RX?
pin3 - TX?
Thanks
|